Internal Linking: The SEO Lever Almost Nobody on the Market Uses
How much time do you spend chasing backlinks? Guest-post pitches, directory submissions, waiting for someone else to reference you — all of it takes time, and the outcome sits in someone else's hands, not yours. Meanwhile there is a link network inside your own site that you fully control and can rebuild today, with nobody's permission required — and almost nobody in the market actually does it.
That network is internal linking. It needs no complex code and no extra budget, just a decision about how your existing pages point to each other. That simplicity is exactly why it usually falls off the list: dozens of articles, service pages and case studies get published, and each one sits on its own island — nothing links in, and it links out to nothing.
1. All the attention goes outward, nobody checks what's already at home
Most SEO advice you hear is built around earning backlinks — get someone to reference you, get listed in a directory, get media coverage. That has value, but every one of those tactics shares the same weakness: the outcome isn't up to you. You are waiting on someone else's link.
Links inside your own site are a different game entirely. Google's own documentation states directly that it uses links for two things: determining the relevancy of pages and finding new pages to crawl. An internal link solves both of those with your own hands — today, waiting on nobody.
Practical step: this week, list your 10 most important pages (service pages, key categories) and check how many internal links point to each one. Search Console's Links report, under "Internal links", shows this for free. A number near zero means the page technically exists on your site but is practically invisible.
2. There's a navigation link, but no editorial one
Almost every site has a header and footer menu — that's a structural link, it repeats identically on every page regardless of content. There is a different kind entirely: an editorial link — one a writer places in the middle of a paragraph because, at that exact point, it genuinely helps the reader. A structural link never changes; an editorial one is different every time, because it's chosen for the topic at hand.
In this market, almost nobody does this. Blog posts get published and then live entirely on their own — none referencing another, as if each article were its own separate site. Google's own guide recommends the opposite: think about what other page on your site would help the reader understand this one, and link to it right inside the text, where it fits the content.
Turning this into a habit is straightforward: every time you publish something new, ask which 2-3 existing pages on your site relate to the same topic, and link to them in a natural spot in the text. Don't forget older posts either — a new article can point back to them, and older ones can be edited to point forward to the new one.
3. The anchor text rule
The link itself isn't the only thing doing work — the words sitting on top of it matter too. There are two failure directions. The first is empty phrases like "click here" or "read more" — they tell neither the reader nor a crawler anything about what's on the other side. The second is stuffing the exact same commercial phrase, say "seo services", into every single mention that points to one page — it stops reading as natural and starts reading as forced.
Google's own recommendation is simple: good anchor text is descriptive, reasonably concise, and relevant both to the page it sits on and the page it points to. In other words, the words above the link should tell the reader what they'll find before they click.
Anchor text is a promise made before the click — a link that never says what's on the other side interests nobody.
The practical rule: write the anchor as a mini-description — "the piece that explains what drives website pricing" rather than "click here". If you link to the same page from several places, phrase the anchor differently, naturally, each time.
4. The depth rule — which pages end up forgotten
This is a different question from how many clicks it takes a visitor to find something — that's a navigation question. Here the question is how many places on the site actually point a link at a given page. The difference matters: if a service page is only reached through a single link in the main menu, it hangs by one thread. If the same page is linked from the menu, from three or four blog posts, and from a related service page, it sits near the centre of the site's own structure.
The conclusion is practical: decide in advance which pages actually drive revenue — usually the service pages — and deliberately connect every new piece of content to one of them. That way links get distributed by your own priorities rather than by accident, and no important page is left forgotten without a single link pointing at it.
5. How to start this month
List your existing pages
A simple table of every service and category page on the site — a sitemap.xml or the admin panel itself is enough to build it from.
Find the "forgotten" pages
Check the internal-links column in Search Console. Flag the pages that matter to you but sit near zero — those need links first.
Build a priority list
Which 5-10 pages actually drive revenue? Keep that list somewhere visible — every new piece of content should link to at least one of them.
Add at least two links to every new piece
One to a page on your priority list, one to an older, topically related post. Keep that habit for a few months and the site stops being a pile of unconnected pages and becomes a network where every part supports the rest.
If you want to see where your site actually stands first, our free SEO audit tool pulls the core technical numbers in a couple of minutes. And if you want the whole structure built out — which page sits where, which ones are the priority — that's what our search-visibility work is for.
